Apparently, there was a talk at SES Chicago to get a site that was shown in general results very quickly. This includes using an existing domain (either yours or purchased) and using it to help you find the site in the “sandbox.” The full forum post can be found here.

This process is in a dark gray range. I wanted to say that first, but once your site is temporarily blocked, this could be another option. It also requires some coding and assumes your site is built with PHP even though I can guess that there is the same ASP code out there.

First, let’s take a look at how this works: 

You have a related domain included and a new domain ‘released’ in the box. By establishing a domain in a built site and showcasing new domain content where you will get a new subdomain with references quickly because it will gain more trust of a larger domain.

Once they are settled you will use another redirect method (probably 301) to redirect the pages to a new domain. The new domain then acquires whatever domain it has acquired in terms of the popularity of the link transferred to the established, trusted domain.

Sounds easy, but there are a few things you need to do.

First, of course, to find an established domain. If you need to buy a site that is outdated but still working (and in your budget) the author recommends that you do so. You will also not change the details of the registrar, according to the author (this will be considered in that blacklist).

You do not want to change the details of the registrar because there is a chance that Google will see a change in ownership and any trusted domain you just bought that you have previously received may be lost.

So let's say you recently bought a related domain that has been around for a few years and has PageRank 5. by leaving the site as it is and not changing the registrar's details you are sure to ensure that the site retains its existing title in search engines.

After that, you will create a subdomain on the site. Here you will place a displayed copy of all your content navigation, etc. From your new site. Since the new site has not been added to the index yet there will be no penalty for duplicate content.

You will use some PHP coding to change the header details to trick the web server into thinking that this page was created earlier than that (suggested PHP code is found in the linked post above). By telling the web server that the pages are old, you are informing the searcher that the pages are also old.

This is because the page is requesting this information from the webserver at the time of identification.

Because you have created a completely new category within a domain established a new category will be identified faster than a new domain.

It will inherit a trust and trust link in the parent domain allowing you to build it much faster than a new site.

Once the domain is fully integrated into Google you will want to redirect it to the new domain.

By doing this you have allowed the content to be discovered by Google which is why you think the pages are old enough because the webserver has been told that those pages are actually old (even though you have just created them).

By redirecting a domain you are transferring the asset and trust given by the subdomain to the main domain on the new site.

The reason this works is that the default site is already trusted by Google. So a vote from a trusted site helps to show Google that a new site is also trusted.

There are some things to consider about this strategy though:

Now that it has been widely publicized I would not have expected it to take so long for Google to see the hole and lock it.

Also, every trust box patent depends on the authority but also on age. So while the page may appear old (because you changed the page title used) Google may choose instead to consider the page's age from the time it finds the page.

In other words, even if the page is one year old, if Googlebot just found the page yesterday then it only has 1 day. While copyright means "document-based, at least in part, on the first date associated with the document," it further states that Google may determine those years not to be the date of the page, but the date on which it received the page.

And remember, like any other form of fraud, you are in danger of being punished by Google. Google's developers also visit these forums, don't forget, so they know exactly when sharing new strategies designed to curb current algorithms.

So it's their job to fix those holes, and maybe even find ways to punish sites that use holes. While no one can prove or disprove this view, I have heard of enough sites removed from the index for doing something they should not have done.

So, while this may sound like a great way to get out of the box ‘early’, think of other ways. What if you exit the index early but Google holds it in 3 months, six months, or more? Do you think they might decide to “write back” any changes to your site if they find that you have participated in such a strategy? After all, you didn't just go back to where you started, you could have been worse off if you had just taken your lumps and done things right.